Notice to my readers: My work is reader supported. Please consider becoming a paid subscriber, or a one-off financial contributor. Doesn’t have to be a lot. All donations gratefully accepted. See below for details of direct payments. Or subscribe via the Substack forum.
— Our Deep Malaise
Most folks are familiar with the legend of Pandora’s Box of Greek mythology and all the evils that were released into the world when Pandora’s curiosity got the better of her. What fewer realise is that in the fable, upon realising what she’d done, she immediately closed the lid. There was one thing remaining: Hope!
As someone who’s mused much on the Covid “pandemic” and related matters, like many I’ve found it difficult at times to escape the deep malaise that comes with the terrain. Put another way: Trying to summon and maintain a sense of “hope” for the future becomes increasingly challenging.
Speaking as a writer and as an individual so affected, of deeper concern to myself is that a significant number of the populace has yet to truly grasp what’s at stake here. My point however is that in order to summon the necessary hope out of the box, we all need to fully understand the nature of the evil that has been released.
Much of this feeling derives from realising the degree to which the experience of the past two and a half years has affected our lives of course. This, along with how criminally orchestrated this crisis has been by the WEF/WHO globalist cabal and which continues to be stage-managed—on its behalf and at its behest—by our respective national leaders. But a goodly portion of this “malaise” comes from knowing that not enough people realise the nature of the evils released by the Great Resetters, aka Pandoras of the Pandemic. What we’re up against as it were!
Those of us who do are inevitably led to ponder how this gambit will play out in the foreseeable future if there isn’t a wholesale awakening to what this agenda is all about. For others who’ve more or less embraced the official narrative of the “pandemic”, to the extent they’ve done so, doubtless most are still hoping to escape the “malaise” and get back to some semblance of normality. Now though is not the time to get comfortable. As optimistic—that is, hopeful—as I might like to be, we are not out of the woods yet.
I often hear it said we’re at war, and in a very real sense that is true. But this is one war where as noted a disturbing number of people against whom it is being waged do not even think of it as such, much less one that it is being waged against us by the very people in whom we have placed an inordinate level of trust. This makes this war very different. The ‘enemy’ includes as noted our own leaders, along with the media and the medical and scientific establishment.
That so many of these folks purport to have our best interests at heart should give us serious cause to be sceptical and even more pause to reflect on how our futures are likely to unfold. If as the great poet T.S. Eliot once observed, ‘most of the evil in this world is done by people with good intentions’, then I’d suggest the very worst evil is perpetrated by those who only feign such intentions. This in essence is what we have before us now. As far as Catherine Austin Fitts’s sees it, we have ‘two roads’ ahead of us. We can ‘preserve, rebuild and protect the human civilization’ she said, or ‘we can become slaves. If you look at what these guys are up to, death is not the worst thing that can happen to you. Do not fear death. Fear slavery in a transhuman society.’
— On the Road to Techno-serfdom
We can begin by considering the looming spectre of the WHO’s Global Pandemic Treaty. If implemented it will transform our respective nations’ to colonies wholly subservient to unelected globalist entities, our sovereignty mortgaged in perpetuity. And the citizens of these nations will be reduced to the status of generically modified, cognitively conditioned techno-serfs, our every whim and wish monitored and manipulated 24/7. It’s difficult to overstate the dire threat such a change presents, though likely scenarios under this new regime aren’t difficult to imagine for those inclined.
Then there is the relentless reports of “adverse events” (‘Big Pharma-speak’ for deadly side effects) resulting from the pseudo-vaccines. Of even greater concern are the totally unpredictable medium- to long-term effects these experimental gene therapies will have on people, in particular their immune systems and their reproductive health. This catastrophe is unfolding under our noses, and is likely to continue for years if not generations to come.
More recently, we have all the chatter about the impending ‘monkey pox’, along with the interminable scare campaigns about plagues, food shortages, wars, supply chain disruptions, infrastructure collapse and general economic disaster. With just these few considerations in mind, can we realistically expect a broader critical mass awakening to occur in such a milieu? Will this be enough to jolt us out of our complacency, or will it be all a bit too much to contemplate?
There are any number of factors I feel are worthy of deeper consideration if ever we’re to break out of this propaganda-induced, existentially threatening torpor, what Mattias Desmet calls a “mass formation psychosis”. One theme that seems to attract very little attention from the media, public health officials, politicians, or for that matter the general public is this: How many of us have given much thought to how all the events we’ve experienced recently have impacted on both the physical and mental health of our youngest and most vulnerable? These are the very people we’re told ad nauseum are our very future, and who could/would disagree with that? And with the nod now being extended to children below the age of five for these experimental treatments, where is this leading to?
In a report late least year UNICEF itself raised concerns about the general health of a generation of children in the wake of the pandemic. ‘The pandemic may represent the tip of a mental health iceberg–an iceberg we have ignored for far too long’, the report said.
And in the UK in August 2021, more than 130 prominent medical professionals signed a letter accusing PM Boris Johnson and other government officials of causing “massive, permanent and unnecessary harm” to the population at large via the measures imposed under Covid ‘prevention’ regimes. Although the letter highlighted all demographics, the signatories singled out the youngest as being amongst the most affected. This is without any mention of the side effects of the “vaccines” themselves. After declaring that ‘[T]he UK’s approach to COVID has palpably failed’, in their scalding conclusion they stated:
‘In the apparent desire to protect one vulnerable group—the elderly—the policies have caused widespread collateral and disproportionate harm to many other vulnerable groups, especially children.’
Here in Australia, the situation is little better. Mission Australia’s 2021 Annual report on youth welfare cited the mental health impacts of the Covid response measures upon 15 to 19-year-olds. The report reveals the pandemic’s toll on teens’ physical and mental health, as well as their financial and housing stability, during 2021. Whilst nearly half of all the 20,000 teenagers surveyed said the measures had affected their physical health and mental well-being, the following findings are disturbing:
one in three said it had damaged relationships with friends and family;
eighty per cent said they had felt lonely in the lead-up to the survey; and
more than two-thirds of girls and over half the boys said their education had also been affected.
As if to underscore just how so much of this might have been avoided and how criminally negligent these policy prescriptions have been, in an uncommonly candid moment of truth from one of our leaders here in Australia, after admitting there was ‘no science behind it at all’, NSW state premier Dominique Perrottet conceded that mandatory QR check-ins and school RAT programs were only a media stunt to counter the fear campaign.
‘We actually brought it back for one reason only’ he said, ‘to instil confidence so that people would go out using QR codes.’
That this “fear campaign” was one orchestrated by the media itself, in cahoots with our politicians, policy makers and health authorities, serves to render the whole affair all the more Kafkaesque!
– The Great Swine Flu Swindle of 2009
If we’re going to reach some level of critical mass awareness of the monstrous fraud that’s been perpetrated upon us, the following trip down into the ‘forgettery’ is as good a place to start as any. In a 2010 report from Britain’s Channel Four7, Wolfgang Wodarg, the then Council of Europe health chief, accused Big Pharma of ‘unduly influencing World Health Organisation (WHO) decisions’ and blueprinting a global ‘campaign of panic’. This was carried out in response to the so-called Swine Flu (H1N1) outbreak that made its debut around twelve months before.
By the time the penny dropped that this much touted existential threat to humanity was far less than the sum of its overblown parts, major European countries (Britain, France, Italy, Germany etc.), were “burdened” with tens of millions of doses of useless vaccines for which they’d forked out “hundreds of millions of dollars” of the taxpayers’ hard-earned. A similar fiasco played out in the US. Though of course most of us had long ago forgotten about this.
For those still enamoured by the official Covid narrative, the preceding alone should provide ample reason to question its authenticity. Chances are most have completely forgotten about this massive scam. For others already harbouring a healthy scepticism or predisposed to seeking a more nuanced insight into the agenda of the Great Resetters but might also have forgotten, it will come as little surprise. On both counts, I can only trust what follows provides a cogent reality check for all on our collective predicament and the perils–present and looming–unleashed upon us by these modern day Pandoras.
SIDEBAR: In this interview, Maria Zee of Zeeemedia speaks with former Blackrock Portfolio Manager Edward Dowd about the coming global economic collapse, manufactured food shortages, the recession he says we are already in, and preparing for what is coming.
All the “grim predictions” about the Swine Flu from the hand-rubbing hordes in Big Pharma in addition to their accomplices in the medical and scientific establishment itself and the ever reliable wolf-criers in the corporate media—proved to be a giant ‘fizzer’. Though it may not have been viewed that way at the time, in terms of furthering the longer-term agenda and tilling the soil for the next Big Pharma harvest, it might now be seen as a roaring success. That’s that “hindsight” thing working overtime again.
It’s notable moreover that the source in the US at least of upwards of 70% of the corporate media’s advertising revenue comes from the pharmaceutical industry. And there can be little doubt that far too many of our medical professionals and health care providers have made themselves far more secure and comfortable in their sinecures than they might otherwise have been had they not put their names on Big Pharma’s dance-card.
With this in mind, some might be forgiven for thinking of the ‘pig-pox’ as a dress rehearsal of sorts, as already suggested, to soften us up for a more ambitious gambit. To fully comprehend this as a possibility (as distinct from conspiracy theories concocted by tin-foil hatters with too much time on their hands), the following should serve as another all-important reality check. Let’s have a look at the “Pandoras” themselves: these are the denizens of the Big Pharma, the ones who essentially wrote the source code for the viral mania we’re all enduring. (See here for some recent Covid myth-busting analysis).
— In Big Bio-Pharma We Trust
In a report from last year, U.S. trial attorney Mike Papantonio, popular host of America’s Lawyer, let rip on Johnson & Johnson (J&J). J&J are of course the health-care and pharmaceutical behemoth (indeed the biggest), at least one of whose self-styled “family of products” are likely to be found in every second home on the planet at any given time. They are also one of many such companies in the industry cashing in on Covid.
Before continuing, it is perhaps worth having a look at the claims J&J make in their ‘brochure’ (i.e. their website). Here’s a taster:
‘At Johnson & Johnson, we are driven to improve the personal health of people everywhere. We deliver products that are rooted in science and endorsed by professionals. Our differentiated portfolio of iconic brands...delivers life-enhancing, first-to-market innovation. By combining the power of science with meaningful human insights and digital-first thinking, we help more than 1.2 billion people live healthier lives every day, from their very first day.’
Now not much therein other than that the feel-good, faux corporate beneficence is so much at odds with our consumer reality, something which as noted we all too often forget, or choose to ignore.
But Papantonio tells a very different story, mostly revolving around J&J’s concealment for decades of the carcinogenic effects of its ubiquitous baby powder, and its complicity along with many other drug companies in the creation and perpetuation—the latter continuing well after after the dangerous side effects became know to them—of the opioid catastrophe.
Papantonio is justifiably scathing in his criticisms of J&J in particular and of the industry as a whole. Space precludes a detailed summary of his report, and readers are encouraged to seek out this program (see link above). Suffice to say that all of the Big Pharma players are very adept at ‘ring-fencing’ their risk in order to protect their brand image and to minimise any negative impact on reputations, revenues, profit margins, and stock prices. Rarely are the concerns of those most affected by their poisonous fare factored into the risk minimisation calculus. It’s all about shilling the next pill, shifting the units, and raking in the filthy lucre! And aggressively suppressing any and all adverse publicity.
Of course many people might say this is stating the bleeding obvious! Perhaps! But can anyone explain why so many ordinary folks seem to have forgotten all this in the age of Covid? Even for those disinclined toward such conspiratorial musing, one would have to at least wonder if indeed the Swine Flu was not one hell of a shell-game, a swindle in short. It’s a pity that so many seem to have ‘deep-sixed’ Big Pharma’s appalling record into the communal ‘forgettery’. A recollection of this sort might have stood us all in good stead in comprehending our current travails.
Which is to say, doesn’t any of this ring any bells? Are we not experiencing a palpable sense of deja vu here? We should be! This is especially considering we are for the first-time en masse being forced or coerced to consume their products!
From the off, this revelation of Big Pharma criminal negligence raises any number of concerns. It also presents for us serious implications for our own individual and collective roles as consumers. Not least of these are the choices we make, less so of our own volition without some due diligence than those based on the quality, reliability, and credibility of information we are presented by these companies. And which they are compelled—theoretically—by both civil and criminal law requirements and basic ethical standards—good corporate governance anyone?—to provide. Once again, the Covid gambit presents us all if we’re willing to see it, enormous implications going forward. For everything!
There are a number of factors common to these instances of companies eventually found guilty of malfeasance, negligence, and/or criminal behaviour. These commonalities are rendered all the more noteworthy with the emergence of the Covid crisis, and underscored by the work of Papantonio and other attorneys such as Robert F Kennedy Jr., Reiner Fuellmich, and Thomas Renz. This is especially so given the controversy surrounding the use of experimental gene therapies being evangelised as the panacea by Big Pharma, and all of us who’ve chosen to embrace the “shill” regarding their effectiveness, safety, even necessity.
Consider the following:
1. It can takes years—even decades—for issues re: product dangers to come to light, with offenders often found to have hidden, distorted or otherwise prevented damaging findings being released;
2. It can and often takes years—again decades—of lobbying and litigation for those seeking compensation to obtain it, with people’s very lives and those of their families frequently in the balance throughout;
3. Companies will pull out every trick in the legal—and not so legal—playbook to avoid or defer accepting moral, ethical, financial, and/or legal responsibility for their actions and decisions;
4. Rarely are mainstream media organisations for many reasons proactive in taking the fight up to the big corporates, not least of which is refusing to risk the advertising revenue stream deriving from the cartel upon which they depend;
5. Rarely do politicians of any note regardless of their party affiliations enter the fray on behalf of victims as their own parties are so dependent upon corporate largesse with themselves unwilling to place at risk future job prospects outside public office;
6. Rarely do any of the relevant regulatory bodies do likewise as many have been neutered, corrupted or at least compromised by ‘regulatory capture’ and the revolving door syndrome;
7. Rarely do the details of any final negotiated settlements—invariably belated as noted—become public as the agreements frequently bind successful litigants to non-disclosure;
8. Rarely do any of the companies or their senior executives ever admit any serious liability for the decisions taken, apologise for, or demonstrate any genuine remorse for their past actions and decisions;
9. Rarely is anyone—past or present—responsible for such decisions in the companies’ concerned personally held accountable or for that matter prosecuted for their actions and the consequences thereof;
10. And almost no-one, in the U.S. or elsewhere—including here Down Under—ever does serious time in the Big House for their criminal recklessness, duplicity, or fraudulent behaviour and conduct.
— Some Further Food for Thought
It is notable that the Swine Flu “pandemic” that wasn’t arrived in the wake of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and prevailed more or less throughout the peaks and troughs of its aftermath. Was this just another coincidence? Or was the Swine Flu scare a distraction from the main game?
Or was this the Covid Commissars (or their predecessors) running this up the flagpole whilst the rest of us were more concerned with the stability of the global economy and getting on with our daily lives?
To answer these questions, it’s important to recall what occurred during this period: it was nothing less than the greatest transfer of wealth and property in history from the lower and middle classes to the already super rich and to the largest multinational banks, financial institutions, and global corporations. Who in themselves are more or less fully owned or controlled subsidiaries of three to four mega corporate entities with only slightly less than the total value of the US economy (20 trillion dollars) in assets under their management. This includes Big Media, Big Tech, BigFood, BigAg, and numerous other “Bigs” of the global economy.
It then should not come as any great surprise that the recent crisis has again similarly facilitated by stealth an even greater transfer of wealth to these same groups, making the 2009-10 heist pale in comparison. We don’t need the test results back from the lab to know there are rats in this pot of gravy!
Bill Gates himself, who has a long history of creating and selling viruses and then offering fixes for them that worked sporadically but still made lots of money off the back of these promises, now reportedly owns anything up to 65% of America’s prime farmland. As one of the principal actors in our unfolding drama, one could write a door-stopper on the estimable Gates and his role therein without making much mention of his involvement in writing its script.
Yet that would appear to be only one of the more visible, questionable signs that something far bigger—indeed far more insidious than most of us might like to think—is afoot with the Covid agenda. It’s time then for a recalibration of our thinking about the zeitgeist. Our future, and that of our children and theirs is at stake, in ways this writer cannot recall being more portentous.
Maybe its time to open the lid to Pandora’s Box and let a bit more hope out! Now that we have a better idea of what we’re up against. But some courage to face the realities of the threats to our future and the determination take some action will also be required from far more people than we have on side as we speak. The aforementioned TS Eliot perhaps said it best: ‘To do the useful thing, to say the courageous thing, to contemplate the beautiful thing: that is enough for one man's life.’ Here’s hoping he’s right!
Greg Maybury, 18 June, 2022.
Further Reading/Viewing:
Catherine Austin Fitts With Greg Hunter: It’s Not a Turndown, It’s a Takedown
Contact/Social Media:
email: poxamerikana1@protonmail.com or
email: greg.maybury@icloud.com
Substack: gregmaybury.substack.com
twitter: @gjmaybury
vk: @gregmaybury (Greg Maybury)
telegram channel: t.me/thenoflyzone